Peking University will enroll students recommended by high school principals in 2010.Tthe recommended students will have extra 30 points added to their national college entrance exam scores. Peking University’s move has set off a nationwide debate.

　　Some people approve of this move. They think this is a bold attempt to reform the current university entrance system, which provides high-quality students and students talented in certain subjects with an opportunity to enter first – class universities and ensure that they aren’t overlooked simply because of their performance in the national university entrance exam. Meanwhile, it will push high schools to pay more attention to the students’ all – round development.

　　However, quite a few people are opposed to the move. In their opinion, it may lead to cheating. Besides, only 39 schools are qualified to recommend students, which is unfair to other schools across the country. Finally, there is no point giving extra scores to those recommended students, for they are mostly top students and have no difficulty entering Peking University.

　　As far as I’m concerned, I’m in favor of this reform. As the process of recommendation is transparent, cheating is impossible. Besides, we should support new reforms even if they are not mature.

　　北京大学将招收2010年高中推荐的学生。被推荐的学生将有额外的30分添加到他们的国家高考分数中。北京大学的举动引发了一场全国性的争论。

　　一些人赞成此举。他们认为这是一个大胆的尝试改革现行的大学入学制度,提供高质量的学生和有才华的学生在某些科目与一个机会进入第一类大学和确保他们不会被忽视,因为他们的性能在全国大学入学考试。与此同时,它将推动高中更加注重学生的全方面的发展。

　　然而,相当多的人反对这一举措。在他们看来,这可能导致作弊。除此之外,只有39学校有资格推荐学生,对全国其他学校是不公平的。最后,没有点给推荐的学生额外的分数,因为他们大多是进入北京大学优秀学生,并没有什么困难。

　　就我而言,我赞成这一改革。推荐的过程是透明的,作弊是不可能的。除此之外,我们应该支持新的改革即使他们不成熟。